Wednesday, May 16, 2018

A little Talos of your very own

I haven't had as much time to work on getting QEMU and Firefox functional/useable on the Talos II over the last few days because of work complications (I'll be reporting on that in a few weeks), but Raptor has heard those of you who are still suffering sticker PTSD from the Talos II and announced the Talos II Lite.

Yes, think of it as the Mac mini G4 to the Talos II's Quad G5. This comparison is not completely inappropriate because the T2L has only one CPU socket (the T2 has two) and thus only 24 PCIe lanes, split amongst an x16 and an x8 (the T2 fully loaded has two x8s and three x16s), and "only" 8 DDR4 slots (the T2 has 16). You can still cram one of the 22-core demons into one of those, though. Starting price is "just" $1399.99, though as with the Talos II the CPU is extra ($375 for 4-core to $2575 for 22-core), the RAM is extra ($255 for 16GB to $2950 for 128GB), and the storage is extra (Microsemi SAS starts at $300 plus drives, or a Samsung 960 EVO NVMe 500GB for $350, or a four-port SATA controller for $50 plus drives). You can also add the same Radeon WX 7100 workstation card that's in the big T2 ($800), too, or just use the same onboard VGA controller that comes with the T2 (built-in). It has USB 3.0 and dual Gig Ethernet, just like the big fella, though it doesn't seem to come with a BD-ROM.

However, the mini:Quad analogy falls down when you look at the actual size of the Lite. It, too, is an EATX behemoth, despite the leaner spec. Personally I would have hoped for something a little more manageably dimensioned. Raptor is taking about offering a smaller board but that would require a redesign and this was probably an artifact of getting it launched cheap(er)ly.

So would I have saved money with my T2 going Lite? Let's price it out: $1400 for the system (includes 500W PSU and EATX case), $595 for the octocore POWER9 (my T2 has two 4-core chips), $535 for 32GB ECC DDR4 RAM, $350 for the SAS card, $800 for the AMD Radeon WX 7100, $50 for the 4-port SATA card (this came installed "free" in my T2) and $350 for the 500GB Samsung NVMe SSD. Sticker price for that configuration is $4080 plus applicable tax and shipping; I repriced the same configuration for the Talos II and got a sticker cost of $7360, about $250 more than what I paid personally (the benefit of being an early adopter), so let's say a cost difference of $3300. That's substantial and a whole lot more palatable. $4080 is actually within Quad G5 range -- I paid not much less than that for my Quad G5 back in the day with the 7800GT and 8GB of RAM. A cheap SATA DVD-RW or something wouldn't add much more to the price if you want an optical drive.

There's a small problem here though: the Lite can't actually accommodate that loadout because there's not enough PCIe slots to get it all in there. In fact, I've got another 1GB NVMe drive to install in my T2, and I'm probably going to pull the now unused Sonnet FireWire/USB PCIe card (I prefer FireWire hubs) from the G5 to install in it too, which may mean temporarily pulling the SAS card until I'm ready to populate the front bays. Also, the Talos II out of the box doesn't support PCIe bifurcation, so I really do need both those slots for my SSDs. Per Raptor it can: with changes to the machine XML definition it could be made to "trifurcate" the x16 endpoint on slot 3 (CPU 2, PHB2) into an x8 and two x4, but that would mean that the available 4-way M.2 NVMe multicards would only have at most three slots available, and the system doesn't ship that way anyhow. Besides, even if you did get bifurcation working on the Lite, you'd only have the remaining x8 for anything else which couldn't be used for an x16 workstation video card. UPDATE: Per Raptor, the Lite's x16 can't be bifurcated due to a hardware limitation, so that is only an option for the big system.

But let's say you're not a maniac like me and you want a basic "budget" config. Let's drop the workstation card and the SAS card, and drop to a 4-core with 16GB, and we have a $2430 system. Wow! Not bad! You've still got the NVMe card and storage expansion over SATA, and you've still got USB ports for audio and the onboard VGA. But you've used up all your PCIe slots, so let's hope you don't need anything else to go internal (let alone 3D acceleration). If you really want that x16 slot back, drop the NVMe card and add some SATA drives ($2080 + devices), but now you're starting to strip this system down more than you might like to, and it doesn't get much cheaper that way.

Overall, that $3300 really does translate into greatly improved expandability in addition to the beefier power supplies, and thus it was never really an option for my needs personally. Maybe my mini:Quad analogy wasn't so off base. But if you want to join the POWER9 revolution on a budget and give Chipzilla the finger, as all right-thinking nerds should, you've now got an option that only requires passing a kidneystone of just half the size or less. It ships starting in July.

Another interesting thing Raptor pointed out: in the Phoronix performance tests, the Talos was running with full Spectre and Meltdown protections, but the x86 wasn't! Boooo! And if you really want to turn Spectre protections off on the Talos for even more grunty, you can do that. Meanwhile, as we speak, Intel is making people take down their firmware documentation and trying to stymie efforts to reverse engineer them. What system would you rather support?

Monday, May 14, 2018

Secure mail on Power Macs is not a good idea

Arguably it hasn't been a good idea for awhile, but the EFAIL hack now makes it possible to decrypt even previous encrypted messages as well as current ones. All known mail clients for PowerPC OS X that can render HTML are vulnerable, including Apple Mail, Thunderbird and Tenfourbird. Earlier clients that lack this functionality are not vulnerable to this specific exploit, but their encryption capabilities are likely insufficient or not otherwise current, so they should not be considered secure either.

The EFAIL vulnerability is not as severe as it might sound because a key requirement is that an attacker already have access to the encrypted messages. If you used the tips in our security recommendations for PowerPC OS X to improve the security of your computer and your network connection, the odds of this occurring are not zero because the attacker may have already collected them in the past through other means, but are likely to be fairly low with the holes that remain. The risk can be mitigated further by disabling HTML rendering of E-mail (that means all E-mail, however, which might be a dealbreaker), and/or disabling automatic decryption of such messages (for example, I already cut and paste encrypted messages I receive into GPG directly in a Terminal window; my E-mail client never decrypts them automatically). A tool like Little Snitch could also be employed to block unexpected accesses to external servers, though this requires you to know what kinds of access would be unexpected for such messages.

Even with these recommendations, however, there may be other potential edge cases such that until someone(tm) updates Thunderbird or another mailer on Power Macs, secure encrypted mail on our systems should be handled with extreme caution and treated as if it were potentially exposed. If you require this kind of security from your E-mail and you must use a Power Mac, you're probably better off finding a webmail service with appropriate security and using TenFourFox (the webmail service then handles this), or building and using an E-mail client on some other system that is more up to date that you can access remotely and securely (which is what I do myself).

Friday, May 4, 2018

TenFourFox FPR7 available

TenFourFox Feature Parity Release 7 final is now available for testing (downloads, release notes, hashes). There are no other changes in this release from beta 3 other than remaining outstanding security patches. It will go live Monday evening Pacific time as usual assuming no showstoppers over the weekend.

Wednesday, May 2, 2018

A semi-review of the Raptor Talos II

After several days of messing with firmware and a number of false starts, the Talos II is now a functioning member of the Floodgap internal network. It's under my desk with my other main daily drivers (my Quad G5, MDD G4, SGI Fuel and DEC Alpha 164LX) and shares a KVM. Thanks to the diligent folks at Raptor, who incredibly responded to my late night messages at 2am Pacific, the fans are now much more manageable and I'm able to get proper video output from the Radeon WX 7100 (though more on that in a minute). As proof of its functionality, I'm typing this blogpost on the Talos instead of on the G5. Here it is in its new home:

I'll call this a "semi-review" because, well, the system is a work in progress and getting the most from it will take time. Relatively little is optimized for PowerPC these days, and even less still for little-endian PowerPC or POWER9 in particular. If you want performance benchmarks, you can read Phoronix's performance tests which are substantially more thorough than anything I could gin up. This is about my experiences with the unit now that I've been using it most of today with my early firmware issues now largely corrected.

For what's in it, see my unboxing photographs from a few days ago. This system is best described as a middle-road configuration now that the 22-core chips are becoming available. It contains two four-core Sforza POWER9 processors on a 14nm process at 3.2/3.8GHz with 512K of L2 and 10MB of L3 per core; there is a discrepancy with the wiki which says 3.1/3.7 but you can read Raptor's spec sheet. SMT is available. By having both processors installed, all of the PCIe slots in this machine are unlocked (this was a deliberate design decision for efficiency, not to make you buy hardware you didn't need). All of the options in this unit are factory-installed: 32GB of ECC DDR4 RAM (maximum 2TB), an AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 workstation video card (roughly a hopped-up RX 480), a Samsung 960 EVO 500GB NVMe SSD on a PCIe card and a Microsemi PM8068 SAS 3.0 controller. The machine comes stock in a Supermicro CSE-747 EATX case with two redundant 1400W power supplies, a SATA controller, onboard VGA, onboard USB 3.0, onboard 2xGigE network ports (Broadcom BCM95719), onboard RS-232 serial and an LG Blu-ray drive. A recovery disc with the factory firmware and manual is included. Sticker price was approximately US$7200.

No operating system is installed except for Petitboot (more in a moment). This machine should eventually run anything that supports it (of course it will run NetBSD, at least someday), but your sole option right now is Linux, and bleeding edge Linux at that: Raptor's excellent tech support team tells me that kernel 4.13 is minimally required and 4.16 is strongly recommended. This greatly limits your choices out of the box especially if you don't already have another Linux system to support bringing this one up. I didn't, so I selected Fedora 28, which supports ppc64le and has kernel 4.16. As of this writing, the final release of 28 has just hit the streets, so that's very timely. Officially Fedora only supports the Server flavour on ppc64le, but we can convert that to a Workstation version after it's installed.

The system boot sequence has several stages. You can read about them in a bit more detail on the RCS Wiki, but the breakdown is not unlike that of a modern POWER server, since this is mostly a modified OpenPOWER design. Immediately when power is applied, the system boots the "BMC" Baseboard Management Controller, which runs on an ARM6L service processor. This sits idle when the main processors are powered down. When the power button is pressed, the BMC starts the Initial Program Load (IPL) process on the main POWER9 CPUs from PNOR flash. Through a complex six-stage process the IPL terminates with loading Petitboot, a simple loader inside a tiny Linux environment called Skiroot. Since Petitboot is running in a tiny Linux, its presence simplifies driver support for the main operating system by handling platform functionality directly via the OpenPOWER Abstraction Layer. Petitboot, in turn, kexec()s into the OS kernel and, at least in theory, away you go.

Initially the fans came on at IPL at a terrific volume such that my wife and I could not reliably hold a conversation in the same room (no exaggeration). In addition, while I could get Petitboot to display on the Radeon card, the operating system wouldn't appear -- I had to use the onboard VGA to boot, which was inconvenient for my KVM and meant my expensive workstation card was doing nothing. Raptor's tech guys listened to my frustrated pleas and notified me immediately when the most current firmware was available. When I loaded this firmware on the system, it worked beautifully for about 10 or 15 minutes and then started freaking out, failing to see the NVMe, kernel panicking on the Fedora disc that it used to boot from, etc. Raptor got me another command to blank the GUARD partition on the PNOR flash to try to reset it, and the machine started working! In fact, I've been using it since about 11am today non-stop, so I consider that to be an excellent burn-in period. Oddly, I can't get Petitboot to appear on the WX 7100 output now, but the OS does, so it's not a big deal (I can just switch to VGA if I need to get into the bootloader until that gets fixed). This all happened literally within the space of a few days. The fans rev up and down periodically, which can be a bit disconcerting next to my usually quiet Quad G5, but they are no longer anywhere near as shrill or constant and I only notice them if the room is warm.

Power usage, incredibly, is quite modest for a machine of this specification. When you connect the power, the BMC sits idle at around 13W with a very quiet fan running. Starting IPL, the fans do still come on full blast at least initially and power usage jumps immediately to 143W. This climbs slowly to 212W by the time you hear the beep from the system indicating Petitboot has started. Petitboot then starts Fedora and once Fedora has booted and we are at the login screen, power usage drops back to around 150W and the fans automatically throttle down. I got out my infrared thermometer and checked the heat coming out the back, and found it was a very reasonable 91 to 99 degrees Fahrenheit. (The cat likes the G5 better for heat.) Most tasks barely moved the needle after that. I did some installations with dnf and the power usage barely rose to 160W. Compiling OpenSSL got it up to 177W. This is all less than the Quad G5 next to it, which right now is reading 238W on the UPS while sitting largely idle in Reduced power mode. On the other hand, I'm not using the video card very heavily, so this output could jump quite a bit once I get some games running on it. There are also no drives connected to the RAID yet, just the NVMe SSD.

You can expect an upgrade path with this hardware as well. Besides accepting any hardware accessories that are compatible with Linux (though see below), Raptor is planning to make additional processor options available if you have the thermal headspace and the power capacity, even this 22 core monster. Unlike the Quad G5, this system shouldn't be a dead end.

So that's the hardware. Let's talk about the software. This isn't under Raptor's control necessarily, but it will play into your decision-making process should you make an investment in one.

There are really two kinds of customers for the Talos II: people like me who dislike x86 on technical grounds and Intel's continued hegemony and wish to support alternative architectures of comparable performance, and people who are paranoid and want a system that is far less of an opaque closed system that they can audit and trust than what passes for commodity hardware these days. There is naturally some overlap between these two groups. The second group will probably put up with a little more inconvenience for the sake of ultimate privacy than the first group, which is more concerned about functionality. You should think long and hard about where you fall here, because it will affect how you perceive the system.

The major selling point to the second group is that the firmware is fully open-source and auditable even down to the FPGA level. Schematics are included! You can download and build your own FPGA flash image, your own BMC flash image and your own PNOR flash image. In fact, you are expected to, though Raptor provides pre-built versions assuming you trust them and their warrant canary. As long as you don't brick the BMC -- though this is doable if you are incautious -- you can play around with Petitboot and Skiboot pretty much at will and just reflash if you screw it up. Programming the FPGA means you'll need your own SPI programmer, but there's a JTAG port on the board and you can plug right in. Note that this scheme isn't perfect because you still have to trust a certain amount of the other firmware in the system, mostly in the various peripheral devices, but it's clearly better than what you'd get from any other system and it's a strong start towards reclaiming control of our own machines. Although I haven't tried writing my own custom firmware yet, it's very easy to build and flash the prefab releases, and the process is well documented. To upgrade to the current firmware from the v1.02 my machine came with did not require flashing the FPGA, so I could do it all from my G5 by talking to the BMC over SSH.

For the first group, however, that alone won't be satisfactory, because we actually want to use this thing as a computer. Frankly, my plan is to make this the Power Mac G5 successor that never was. It certainly has the specs for it. Unfortunately, this part is the bit that's not yet complete. I haven't tried other operating systems other than Fedora 28 yet, but I can't imagine the experience is much different, so take these observations at face value.

Because Fedora doesn't offer a direct download for Workstation on little-endian 64-bit PowerPC, you have to install Server first, and then switch to the Workstation environment. This will download the remaining missing pieces; I selected the default Workstation environment, which is based on GNOME. Hopefully future distros supporting this machine will do better than this process. While in use the system is perfectly responsive but seems slower than it ought to be at times, particularly compared to the Quad G5, though this is probably an unfair comparison. The G5 is running Mac OS X 10.4.11, an OS written by its manufacturer and highly optimized for it. The Talos II has to contend with an OS for which it is not the primary target, nor one that is particularly tuned for any PowerPC system.

There are various glitches and many things don't work yet. The first and most important deficiency is that I still can't get amdgpu working in Xorg, so I'm using framebuffer support (fbdev). This means the video card is still going largely underutilized. I expect this to improve as Polaris support improves, but it's not there yet. For this reason I haven't even bothered trying to load any games on it so far.

Multimedia is also limited because I don't have a sound device. lspci alleges the WX 7100 has some sort of audio support, but the open source drivers don't currently support it. I'll likely solve this problem with some sort of USB audio out in the meantime, but that's suboptimal. I haven't tried playing DVD or BD movies on it yet either for that reason.

Fedora didn't like the GBU-421 Bluetooth USB dongle I use with the G5. The G5 needed no drivers and it just "works," but GNOME doesn't see it. I had to transfer the picture above from my phone to the G5, and then to the Talos.

A few of the included applications either misbehave or don't work at all, though most fortunately do. The GNOME Software application kept complaining about incorrect checksums, but dnf was fine from the command line. Firefox 59 crashes with a segmentation fault on start-up (like I say, I guess I've got a project now). GNOME Web (formerly Epiphany) does work, but it's WebKit and I don't like that, and it too is not very well optimized. It does pretty well, though, considering; it got 2455ms on SunSpider, which would seem like a dismal number given that the Quad G5 managed 2255ms in TenFourFox, except that TenFourFox has a JIT and GNOME Web here is running interpreted, and TenFourFox is compiled with CPU optimizations specifically for the G5 while GNOME Web and the system WebKit have no specific optimizations. I'm also unhappy there's no Gopher support. On the other hand, you would expect YouTube videos to be a slideshow (no JIT, little or no SIMD), and yet they play at a surprisingly good framerate, just muted. This post is being written in GNOME Web.

However, much of the rest of it does work. Since I intend this to be a successor to my G5, I spent most of the afternoon making GNOME more Mac-like. Using Fondu, I copied the Lucida Grande font from Tiger and converted it back to TTF (to compile Fondu on the Talos, configure it with ./configure x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, since it doesn't know what the heck a little-endian PowerPC is) and installed it. I then installed the GNOME Tweaks tool with dnf and a Mac GNOME theme and Dock extension. (Some other ideas are on this how-to.) I switched the system font to Lucida Grande in the Tweaks tool, disabled hinting entirely and left it with greyscale antialiasing, turned on User shell themes in Tweaks, and wrote a minimal shell theme to make the top bar more like a Mac menu bar. It's not perfect, but it's a good start. I'll provide it later if people are interested.

To get my Mac shortcut keys back, I installed AutoKey (autokey-gtk), and started making equivalents. A few clashed with GNOME, which I changed from Settings, and I altered a couple others in Terminal, but they mostly just worked with everything else including GNOME Web.

Let's bottom line it. As far as value for money, the machine is well-assembled, solidly built (if in an unexciting enclosure) and consists of quality components. I think the above paragraphs also demonstrate that the level of support from Raptor is absolutely commensurate with what you would expect for a $7000+ computer. Frankly, it's one of the best technical support experiences I've ever had with any system. Part of that is undoubtedly the low production numbers and highly technical engineering audience, but I have never felt like the machine was an unrecoverable doorstop even when it wasn't suitable for use yet.

Software, however, is still a work in progress. You should not expect a 100% functional system at the end and you don't even get a functional system out of the box. Not only will you have to install an OS and go through that process, you're also pretty much guaranteed that something won't work when that part is done. And even when everything you need actually is working, nothing is optimized for it; many things will run abnormally slowly until "someone" (tm) does this work. It's been a long time since PowerPC was a common desktop platform, so many of the optimizations Intel systems take for granted just don't exist, and some desktop apps aren't even tested.

But all of these things are correctable. The hardware is solid. The firmware rudiments are coming together; look at how quickly this machine evolved in just a few short days. Software is likely to be an easier nut to crack on the little-endian Talos than on previous big-endian PowerPC systems, too. Assuming there aren't dependencies on complex assembly code blocks, more code is likely to "just" work with fewer or no modifications because the assumptions made for mainstream x86 will now largely apply here as well. This depresses me personally since I think in big-endian, and have used big-endian systems for decades, but that's the way things are now.

I'm looking forward to this system becoming my daily driver and it might even happen in just a few months. I need to get Firefox working, and I need to get QEMU optimized to run my old Power Mac software. That's all doable. Once the video card and sound options are fixed, I can even start using it for multimedia and games, and the G5 can then become a well-cherished part of my collection.

This is a fully free system you can live with. This is a fully free system that can kick ass. The promise was kept and the dream is real. It's time to get busy.

Sunday, April 29, 2018

TenFourFox FPR7b3 available

TenFourFox Feature Parity Release 7 beta 3 is now available (downloads, hashes, release notes). This version includes some last-minute tuning to garbage and cycle collection frequency, a couple more hosts for basic adblock, and (the big change) a major fix to DOM keyboard events which caused some sites to fail to respond to keyboard input (like this Applesoft BASIC implementation in JavaScript -- thanks Martin Kukač for the more easily debugged test case). There are also some additional security fixes and there will be a few more prior to release on or about May 8.

For FPR8 the original plan was to get a decent implementation of CSS grid support working, but same-site cookies have risen in priority as they are now being required as a security measure on many sites including one I personally use frequently. If there is time left once that particular major upgrade is functional, I will then work on CSS grid and (as it slowly progresses) native date-time pickers. The FAQ is also dreadfully out of date, so I'll be spending some time on that too.

The Raptor Talos II (check it out if you haven't seen the Talos' unboxing) is now under my desk with the DEC Alpha 164LX, Silicon Graphics Fuel, MDD G4 and of course the Quad G5. Unfortunately to make room for the Talos in the KVM, a system had to be sacrificed: my old and now largely unused Core2Duo Mac mini running 10.6. It has been relegated to the server-storage room while I think about what to do with it. I got Fedora 28/kernel 4.16 booting on the Talos, but there are still issues with the discrete GPU, and the fans still roar like a SpaceX launch. (Also, Firefox 59 crashes on bootup on POWER9, but that's not Raptor's fault. Guess I have my work cut out for me.) Fortunately, Raptor's technical support team has come through with new firmware for the Radeon card and it looks like there is a BMC update on the way to address the ventilation issues, so we'll see how far we get with those. A full review will follow once I have the system in daily-driver condition.

Yes, dear reader, this is what it feels like to live on the bleeding edge of technology.

Friday, April 27, 2018

Unboxing the Talos II: it's here!

UPDATE: Read a semi-review of the Raptor Talos II!

This post is being written in TenFourFox FPR7 beta 3. More about that in a day or two, because today a big container arrived at my P.O. box. I had to put the rear seats down to get it into my 2018 Honda Civic Si Sedan.

The Raptor Talos II (see my previous posts for more) arrives in an 80-pound box. It's a good thing I already had mesh put in for my hernia surgery because I needed it today, by golly. No complaints about the packaging as the unit came very well protected. Gorgeous wife unwillingly positioned for scale (she is 5'4"); the computer is lengthwise and rather longer than your typical tower system:

Inside the accessory box were the keys, footsies, extra header and SATA cables, the recovery DVD for the firmware (with manual), printed QR codes to get public keys for verification, power cables, and the parts removed from the case to install my BTO options described below.

The computer is in an otherwise off-the-shelf Supermicro CSE-747 (hah!) EATX chassis. It's kind of a boring look, but it does have 11 slots, 8 hard disk bays and two 5.25" bays. On the rear here are dual redundant 1400W (!) power supplies, an honest-to-goodness RS-232 serial port, two GigE ports (top is shared with the "Baseboard Management Controller" service processor), two rear USB 3.0 ports and a VGA video port.

But there is some special branding, though I wouldn't have minded some fun case graphics myself:

The chassis is lockable and has excellent ventilation, though the design isn't really all that interesting. I'm thinking of removing the front badge and then doing something like I did for my DEC Alpha 164LX.

An LG Blu-ray drive is included. Take that, Steve Jobs.

It's serial number 12! (I was order 8 originally, in August 2017.)

Well, let's crack it open. Remove the two retention screws from the rear of the case (I would have rather had thumbscrews here) and pop out and lift the side case lever to remove the side door, exposing the interior of the machine. I put the computer on its side here for these photographs.

This AMD Radeon Pro WX7100 is a factory-installed option ...

... as well as the Samsung 960 EVO NVMe storage unit and the Microsemi PM8068 SAS 3.0 controller. This will drive the front bay RAID. They are also BTO options.

This SATA controller connects to the optical drive. One of the four DIMM banks is visible. I had 32GB of ECC RAM factory-installed (as two 16GB sticks).

The Supermicro SAS747TQ backplane comes from the factory ready to go connected to the optional Microsemi. I'll be making a Fry's run soon to populate the front bays.

Yuuuuuuge processor heatsinks. You'll need a 5/32" hex driver (Raptor sells one, but my trusty Bondhus #13109 seems to work). They came pre-installed and visually inspected good. This unit has two four-core Sforza POWER9 CPUs at 3.1/3.7 GHz with 90W TDP.

It's even louder than the Quad G5 when it starts, if you can imagine that. The most current firmware supposedly addresses the fan volume but it's still intolerably loud especially compared to the G5 when it's idle. We'll see how it behaves once I get an operating system on it.

Up in Petitboot. No operating system is installed. That's your job!

Right now the firmware is up to date, though I would be remiss not to try to rebuild it from scratch at some point to personally audit it (since the NSA is probably all upin my bidness now for having purchased the thing). I was able to get into the BMC and talk to it from the G5 and all of the hardware seems to be in working order. However, I haven't had much success with actually booting it because I have and want to use my discrete AMD GPU, meaning I'll preferentially need to find a distro with Linux 4.16 or later. (I could use something earlier if I really wanted to, but it would require some jumping through hoops with a serial terminal that I don't really feel like doing right now.) Fedora 28 seems the best bet for getting something working, and then we can see where we're at as other distros catch up.

I'll post progress reports on the Talos as I actually make progress; I'm mostly just excited to finally have it in my hands. This is a heck of a system with quality parts, built to do real work, and my first impression is that the $7200 I dropped on it has gone to good use.

Meanwhile, more about FPR7b3 a little later this weekend. It's mostly a feature and tuneup release, all good stuff.

Saturday, April 14, 2018

TenFourFox FPR7b2 available

Despite being currently in the grip of my annual case of bronchitis, in which I sweat and secrete more foul cloudy phlegm than Jabba the Hutt, TenFourFox Feature Parity Release 7 beta 2 is now available for testing (downloads, hashes, release notes).

The reason for beta 2 was to fix a serious regression caused by issue 495. Since I was issuing a second beta anyway, I took the opportunity to make a few more fixes, including a glitch with image layout that manifested on the MorphOS site, fixing SourceForge's tendency to corrupt our pulldown menus with unrenderable icons, and adding support for TLS SHA-384 ciphers to fix an issue with HTTP/2 sites. There are also some security fixes for testing and instead of changing the fx shorthand UA template to Firefox 60, I just added a new fx60 one as well as a user agent for Internet Explorer 11. This means users whose sites incorrectly sniff them and are using the current Firefox 52 impersonation won't unexpectedly get Fx60 features enabled that the browser can't handle right now (this is particularly an issue for Gmail).

As a result, I'm going to rework the user agent support in TenFourFoxBox, meaning version 1.1 will not get an official release (I'll be going to 1.2). Yes, this will include allowing custom agent strings, though you'll need to do that from the command line. It will be left up at the old URL until the new one is completed.

Meanwhile, my excitement over the Talos systems finally shipping cannot be contained by my mucus. It looks like motherboard orders are being fulfilled and are already out in the public. The system depicted there, however, is not the Talos II as shipped. On the other hand, however, Phoronix actually did get access to a confirmed Talos II, pitted the POWER9 versus AMD Epyx Epyc and Intel Xeon, and came away very impressed. Especially when we consider that the software packages in question were in no way optimized for POWER9 (and are for x86_64), the Talos has very competitive performance even pitted against non-libre systems. I haven't heard that the full workstations are shipping yet, but given that the rest of the components are all off-the-shelf, it shouldn't take long.

2005 called, folks. They want their PowerPC performance jokes back.